THE CONSPIRACY ABOUT THE DEATH OF LADY D. - VOL. 1
Disclaimer: We have chosen to do this both in english and italian to improve our writing, so we apologize in advance, please be kind :)
Perhaps for some of you this will seem like a date like any other, but for many others there is only one thing that immediately comes to mind going back to that specific day: the tragic and premature death of Lady Diana Spencer.
This date will remain in the annals of History for the tragic accident that involved the Princess and her companion, Dodi Al-Fayed, son of the Egyptian tycoon Mohamed Al-Fayed, and which cost their life.
But are we sure that it was all the result of a terrible and casual tragedy and that there is nothing else under it?
The two lovers were traveling by car from the Hotel Ritz in Paris to Al-Fayed's apartment, with Dodi's bodyguard, Trevor Rees-Jones, when their Mercedes, driven by mr. Henri Paul, lost control and crashed into the thirteenth pillar of the tunnel that runs under the Pont de l'Alma.
Obviously, the first to arrive on the spot right after the accident were the paparazzi who were following the car, not missing the tempting opportunity and immediately taking the first photos.
Upon the arrival of rescuers and law enforcement officers both Dodi and Henri Paul were already dead.
According to the photographers' statements, Diana was still alive, although seriously injured. They heard her repeat the phrase "Oh my God" several times; they found her lying on the vehicle, bleeding from both her nose and ears. When Lady D was brought out of the car, she was taken to the Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital where, due to too extensive internal injuries, she was declared dead a few hours later.
Trevor Rees-Jones was transferred to the hospital and underwent several hours of surgery. He was the only one to survive, despite serious facial injuries.
Yes, that evening the paparazzi were, as always, on the hunt for trophies, looking for some scoops to be sold at a high price to the gossip magazines that still march on Lady D, and continued to shoot once they arrived on the scene. What a lucky evening, from this point of view.
THE PLOT
The conspiracy theory about Lady D's death is one of the most obvious things to think about when we talk about this tragic event.
It is not so strange to believe that the events of August 31, 1997 were the result of an "accident" caused specifically to break the lives of Diana and Dodi. The couple was experiencing a love certainly not appreciated by the largest Western Monarchy.
To think that the ex-wife of the future King of England was about to marry a powerful Egyptian tycoon, who was also a Muslim, was certainly not much appreciated by the Royal Family.
Some even claimed that Diana had already converted to Islam. Among the fervent supporters of this theory was Dodi's father, the multimillionaire Mohamed Al-Fayed. He publicly declared to the British tabloids his belief that the two lovers had been killed for the political reasons mentioned above.
In September 1999 the French authorities closed the case stating that it was all an accident, but Al-Fayed obviously did not agree to put an end to the case and decided to continue investigating privately. After a while he declared that behind the accident there was the hand of MI6, the main intelligence secret agency of the United Kingdom and therefore in the service of the Queen herself.
Let's analyze some of the most frequently asked questions that the people have about these facts, to find out if there is actually a plot behind it or not.
In this first post dedicated to the mystery of Diana's death we asked ourselves:
Are we sure about the so-called accident?
According to the various French and English judicial investigations, the answer is yes, but according to our theory and our analysis of the facts the answer is NO !!!!
In fact, there are more clues that lead to the conspiracy route than factors that support the casualty solution. Many things indicate that a pre-incident plot actually existed and there is evidence to support this theory. They are not simple allusions: none of the judicial investigations carried out is totally reliable and there are important clues regarding these claims.
For example, regarding the dynamics of the accident: according to the Investigation Commission, both British and French investigators confirm that the sharp deviation suffered by Mercedes COULD have been caused by a SECOND VEHICLE. This elusive vehicle COULD have caused the car to skid and then get it out of its normal path.
Another very important thing, some eyewitnesses saw a white Fiat Uno enter the tunnel ... so it is actually plausible that there was a second vehicle inside the tunnel. Even a motorbike with two people on board was seen entering the crime scene and it could have been this motorbike itself that caused the "accident".
Another possible solution can be the tampering of the brakes of the Mercedes on which the couple was traveling. Given the events of that evening, the sabotage could have happened in two places: in the garage of Saint-Ouen (parking used by the Ritz) or, just before the escape by car, in the street behind the Hotel Ritz.
At the accident site, on the asphalt, traces of tires were found. According to a "Liberation" journalist, this Laurent Joffrin, who had the opportunity to speak with Mercedes Benz crash-test experts, those tracks could not be from Mercedes because the cars equipped with working ABS do not leave traces when braking.
The investigations carried out have never tried to find out what car those traces found on the asphalt were ... perhaps because they wanted to hide the truth from us ...
... to be continued ...
Forse per alcuni di voi questa sembrerà una data come un'altra, ma per moltissimi altri c'è solo una cosa che torna subito alla mente ripensando a quel preciso giorno: la tragica e prematura scomparsa di Lady Diana Spencer.
Questa data resterà negli annali della storia per il tragico incidente che fu letale per la Principessa e per il suo compagno, Dodi Al-Fayed, figlio del magnate egiziano Mohamed Al-Fayed.
Ma siamo sicuri che sia stato tutto frutto di una terribile e casuale tragedia e che non ci sia nient'altro sotto?
August 31st, 1997.
This date will remain in the annals of History for the tragic accident that involved the Princess and her companion, Dodi Al-Fayed, son of the Egyptian tycoon Mohamed Al-Fayed, and which cost their life.
But are we sure that it was all the result of a terrible and casual tragedy and that there is nothing else under it?
The two lovers were traveling by car from the Hotel Ritz in Paris to Al-Fayed's apartment, with Dodi's bodyguard, Trevor Rees-Jones, when their Mercedes, driven by mr. Henri Paul, lost control and crashed into the thirteenth pillar of the tunnel that runs under the Pont de l'Alma.
Obviously, the first to arrive on the spot right after the accident were the paparazzi who were following the car, not missing the tempting opportunity and immediately taking the first photos.
Upon the arrival of rescuers and law enforcement officers both Dodi and Henri Paul were already dead.
According to the photographers' statements, Diana was still alive, although seriously injured. They heard her repeat the phrase "Oh my God" several times; they found her lying on the vehicle, bleeding from both her nose and ears. When Lady D was brought out of the car, she was taken to the Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital where, due to too extensive internal injuries, she was declared dead a few hours later.
Trevor Rees-Jones was transferred to the hospital and underwent several hours of surgery. He was the only one to survive, despite serious facial injuries.
Yes, that evening the paparazzi were, as always, on the hunt for trophies, looking for some scoops to be sold at a high price to the gossip magazines that still march on Lady D, and continued to shoot once they arrived on the scene. What a lucky evening, from this point of view.
THE PLOT
The conspiracy theory about Lady D's death is one of the most obvious things to think about when we talk about this tragic event.
It is not so strange to believe that the events of August 31, 1997 were the result of an "accident" caused specifically to break the lives of Diana and Dodi. The couple was experiencing a love certainly not appreciated by the largest Western Monarchy.
To think that the ex-wife of the future King of England was about to marry a powerful Egyptian tycoon, who was also a Muslim, was certainly not much appreciated by the Royal Family.
Some even claimed that Diana had already converted to Islam. Among the fervent supporters of this theory was Dodi's father, the multimillionaire Mohamed Al-Fayed. He publicly declared to the British tabloids his belief that the two lovers had been killed for the political reasons mentioned above.In September 1999 the French authorities closed the case stating that it was all an accident, but Al-Fayed obviously did not agree to put an end to the case and decided to continue investigating privately. After a while he declared that behind the accident there was the hand of MI6, the main intelligence secret agency of the United Kingdom and therefore in the service of the Queen herself.
Let's analyze some of the most frequently asked questions that the people have about these facts, to find out if there is actually a plot behind it or not.
In this first post dedicated to the mystery of Diana's death we asked ourselves:
Are we sure about the so-called accident?
In fact, there are more clues that lead to the conspiracy route than factors that support the casualty solution. Many things indicate that a pre-incident plot actually existed and there is evidence to support this theory. They are not simple allusions: none of the judicial investigations carried out is totally reliable and there are important clues regarding these claims.
For example, regarding the dynamics of the accident: according to the Investigation Commission, both British and French investigators confirm that the sharp deviation suffered by Mercedes COULD have been caused by a SECOND VEHICLE. This elusive vehicle COULD have caused the car to skid and then get it out of its normal path.
Another very important thing, some eyewitnesses saw a white Fiat Uno enter the tunnel ... so it is actually plausible that there was a second vehicle inside the tunnel. Even a motorbike with two people on board was seen entering the crime scene and it could have been this motorbike itself that caused the "accident".
Another possible solution can be the tampering of the brakes of the Mercedes on which the couple was traveling. Given the events of that evening, the sabotage could have happened in two places: in the garage of Saint-Ouen (parking used by the Ritz) or, just before the escape by car, in the street behind the Hotel Ritz.
At the accident site, on the asphalt, traces of tires were found. According to a "Liberation" journalist, this Laurent Joffrin, who had the opportunity to speak with Mercedes Benz crash-test experts, those tracks could not be from Mercedes because the cars equipped with working ABS do not leave traces when braking.
The investigations carried out have never tried to find out what car those traces found on the asphalt were ... perhaps because they wanted to hide the truth from us ...
... to be continued ...
THE WIZARD
__________________________________________________________________
31 agosto 1997.
Questa data resterà negli annali della storia per il tragico incidente che fu letale per la Principessa e per il suo compagno, Dodi Al-Fayed, figlio del magnate egiziano Mohamed Al-Fayed.
Ma siamo sicuri che sia stato tutto frutto di una terribile e casuale tragedia e che non ci sia nient'altro sotto?
I due innamorati si stavano spostando in auto dall’Hotel Ritz di Parigi verso un appartamento di Al-Fayed assieme alla guardia del corpo di Dodi, Trevor Rees-Jones, quando la loro Mercedes, guidata dall'autista Henri Paul, perse il controllo e si schiantò contro il tredicesimo pilastro della galleria che corre sotto il Pont de l’Alma.
Ovviamente, i primi ad arrivare sul posto dopo l'incidente furono i paparazzi che stavano seguendo l'auto, non perdendo la ghiotta occasione e scattando immediatamente le prime foto.
All'arrivo dei soccorritori e delle forze dell'ordine sia Dodi che Henri Paul erano già morti.
Secondo le dichiarazioni dei fotografi, Diana era ancora viva, anche se gravemente ferita. La sentirono ripetere diverse volte la frase "Oh my God"; la trovarono distesa sul veicolo, sanguinante sia dal naso che dalle orecchie. Quando Lady D venne estratta dall'auto fu portata all'ospedale Pitié-Salpêtrière ma, per via delle lesioni interne troppo estese, fu dichiarata morta alcune ore dopo.
All'arrivo dei soccorritori e delle forze dell'ordine sia Dodi che Henri Paul erano già morti.
Secondo le dichiarazioni dei fotografi, Diana era ancora viva, anche se gravemente ferita. La sentirono ripetere diverse volte la frase "Oh my God"; la trovarono distesa sul veicolo, sanguinante sia dal naso che dalle orecchie. Quando Lady D venne estratta dall'auto fu portata all'ospedale Pitié-Salpêtrière ma, per via delle lesioni interne troppo estese, fu dichiarata morta alcune ore dopo.
Trevor Rees-Jones fu trasferito in ospedale e fu sottoposto a un intervento chirurgico di diverse ore. Fu l'unico a sopravvivere, nonostante le gravi lesioni al viso.
Sì, quella sera i paparazzi erano come sempre a caccia di trofei, di qualche scoop da vendere a caro prezzo alle riviste di gossip che ancora oggi marciano su Lady D, e continuarono a scattare una volta arrivati sulla scena. Una serata fortunata, sotto questo punto di vista.
IL COMPLOTTO
La teoria del complotto riguardo la morte di Lady D è una delle cose più ovvie a cui pensare quando si parla di questo tragico avvenimento.
Non è così strano credere che i fatti del 31 agosto 1997 siano stati il frutto di un incidente provocato appositamente per spezzare le vite di Diana e Dodi. La coppia stava vivendo un amore di certo non gradito dalla più grande monarchia occidentale.
Pensare che l'ex moglie del futuro Re d'Inghilterra stava per sposare un potente magnate egiziano, per giunta mussulmano, non era di certo cosa molto gradita alla Royal Family.
Non è così strano credere che i fatti del 31 agosto 1997 siano stati il frutto di un incidente provocato appositamente per spezzare le vite di Diana e Dodi. La coppia stava vivendo un amore di certo non gradito dalla più grande monarchia occidentale.
Pensare che l'ex moglie del futuro Re d'Inghilterra stava per sposare un potente magnate egiziano, per giunta mussulmano, non era di certo cosa molto gradita alla Royal Family.
Alcuni sostenevano addirittura che Diana si fosse già convertita all'Islam. Tra i fervidi sostenitori di questa teoria ci fu proprio il padre di Dodi, il multimilionario Mohamed Al-Fayed. Egli dichiarò pubblicamente ai tabloid inglesi la propria convinzione che i due amanti fossero stati uccisi per i motivi politici sopracitati. Nel settembre 1999 le autorità francesi chiusero il caso affermando che era stato tutto un incidente, ma Al-Fayed ovviamente non accettò di mettere la parola fine sul caso e decise di continuare ad indagare per vie private. Dopo poco dichiarò che dietro all'incidente c'era la mano nientepopodimeno che dell'MI6, la principale agenzia di spionaggio segreto e di intelligence del Regno Unito e quindi al servizio della Regina stessa.
Analizziamo con cura alcune delle domande più frequenti che il pubblico si pone davanti a questi fatti, per scoprire se dietro ci sia effettivamente un complotto o no.
In questo primo post dedicato al mistero della scomparsa di Diana ci siamo chiesti:
In questo primo post dedicato al mistero della scomparsa di Diana ci siamo chiesti:
E' certo che l'incidente stradale sia stato casuale?
In effetti, ci sono più indizi che portano a pensare alla via del complotto che fattori che sostengono la soluzione dell'incidente casuale. Molte soluzioni fanno pensare che un complotto pre-incidente sia veramente esistito e ci sono delle prove che sostengono questa teoria. Non sono semplici allusioni: nessuna delle inchieste giudiziarie svolte è totalmente affidabile e ci sono indizi importanti a riguardo di queste affermazioni.
Per esempio, per quanto riguarda la dinamica dell'incidente: secondo la Commissione Inquirente, sia gli inquirenti inglesi che francesi confermano che la deviazione brusca subita dalla Mercedes POTREBBE essere stata provocata da un SECONDO VEICOLO. Questo fantomatico veicolo POTREBBE aver fatto sbandare la macchina e farla quindi uscire dalla sua normale traiettoria.
Altra cosa molto importante, alcuni testimoni oculari hanno visto entrare nel tunnel una Fiat Uno bianca...quindi è davvero plausibile che ci fosse un secondo veicolo dentro la galleria. Anche una moto con a bordo due persone è stata vista entrare nel luogo del misfatto e potrebbe essere stata proprio questa moto a causare l' "incidente".
Un'altra via percorribile può essere la manomissione dei freni della Mercedes su cui viaggiava la coppia. Considerati gli avvenimenti di quella sera, il sabotaggio può essere avvenuto in due posti: nel garage di Saint-Ouen (parcheggio usato dal Ritz) oppure, poco prima della fuga in auto, nella strada dietro l'Hotel Ritz.
Nel luogo dell'incidente, sull'asfalto, sono stati trovati tracce di pneumatici. Secondo un giornalista di "Liberation", tale Laurent Joffrin, che ha avuto modo di parlare con esperti di crash-test della Mercedes Benz, quelle tracce non potevano essere della Mercedes perchè le vetture munite di ABS funzionante non lasciano tracce al momento della frenata.
Le inchieste svolte non hanno mai cercato di scoprire di che macchina fossero quelle tracce trovate sull'asfalto...forse perchè volevano nasconderci la verità...
Le inchieste svolte non hanno mai cercato di scoprire di che macchina fossero quelle tracce trovate sull'asfalto...forse perchè volevano nasconderci la verità...
...to be continued...
IL MAGO
Comments
Post a Comment